Friday, February 25, 2011

TWO MEN

I've watched the Charlie Sheen, Two and Half Men drama unfold for over a year now.  I've resisted commenting because I know Charlie and Chuck and have deep respect and admiration for both men.  It saddens me deeply to see it play out the way it has this week.  

As a man who understands the pain and power of addiction, I am empathetic to Charlie's struggles.  Getting clean is terrifying and difficult -- physically, mentally and spiritually.  I watch his bold actions and I try to feel more compassion than outrage.  

I am also a showrunner and know what it's like to invest so deeply in a show and a cast.  They become an extension of who you are.  You imbue your words with little pieces of your soul and hand them over to actors whom you learn to trust and respect.  Having your star verbally assault you is a tremendously egregious and hurtful thing.  

A showrunner-star relationship is like a marriage.  Two people giving 100%, two people taking ownership of all it creates, two people with one goal -- happiness and success.  And like a marriage, it can be symbiotic bliss, or a hellish fuckshow.  I saw Shawn Ryan and Michael Chiklis maneuver that relationship on The Shield.  The success of that show happened very quickly.  Both men flooded with accolades they never had before.  Shawn, an unknown writer, Michael an actor previously known for softer roles.  Shawn and Michael had enormous respect for each other, but both men had to navigate that success very carefully.  It was a cautious, proprietary back and forth that I feel both Shawn and Michael did with dignity.  On Sons, I love my cast.  Truly.  They've become a big, lovable dysfunctional family to me.  I give them every drop of my blood and they do the same in return.  My, star, Charlie Hunnam, is the consummate professional.  Yes, he's got opinions and feeling and desires about the show, but our creative discourse (when not being twisted by cunt bloggers) is always respectful and productive.

Showrunner and star.  Two men.  One the mind, one the body.  Without both, there is nothing.  The ego in constant struggle with humilitas.  Trying to maintain a balance between "Look what I did" and "Look what we did".  

With Two and a Half Men, there's more than just a TV show at stake, it's a fucking money machine.  So along with awards, critical accolades, great ratings, you have a creative entity that generates billions.  So as a creator and or star, you suddenly become aware that you are responsible for a huge chunk of a corporate bottom line.  That's pretty intoxicating.  When you have Les and company licking your sack, it's hard not to feel like king of the fucking world.  

To coin a Peter Parker cliche, "...with great power, comes great responsibility".   In my opinion, the biggest responsibility of success is staying humble.  For me and my healthy ego, it's a daily struggle.  The old saying, "don't start believing your own press" is very true.  You must take a step back and realize that you may be the top of the pyramid, but it takes thousands of others to support your point.  It doesn't mean you can't have a passionate ego or you have to give away your money to starving children, it just means you have to stay aware that there is something greater than you spinning the plates.

I have no advice for Chuck.  I consider him a friend.  He is a smarter, more evolved man than I am.  I think he's done the best he can under the circumstances.  Pulling the show, as devastating as it will be to the thousands it employs (including my sister-in-law), is the most humane thing to do.

I have no advice for Charlie.  I consider him a friend.  He is on his own path and I just hope he doesn't harm himself or others.  Somewhere under the anger and deep-seeded discontent, there's an awareness of the right action.  I hope he takes it.  


Saturday, February 12, 2011

BLOGGERS WHO ARE NOT...


As expected, I've gotten some impassioned responses to my last post.  The C-word tends to do that.  As with most of my bombastic, over-the-top posts, it served its purpose -- calling attention away from the negative issue and onto myself.  The feedback shifted away from people questioning Charlie's loyalty to me as outspoken antihero and/or arrogant douchebag.  

In the my previous entry, I qualified that there were as many good blogs as bullshit blogs.  So, I thought in the name of fairness, I'd list some blogs that are written by intelligent, fair-minded, non-cunts.  These are my top twenty entertainment blogs (mostly TV) that I read at least a few times a week, if not every day.  Yes, I get 98% of my content from the Internet.  Here they are, in no particular order --

Nikki Finke and Nellie Andreeva
http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/watch_with_kristin

Michael Ausiello and Megan Masters 
http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/

The Hollywood Reporter 
http://thetvjunkie.net

The Futon Critic
http://thefutoncritic.com/news/ 

Daniel Malen

She's not an entertainment blog, but I adore her --
http://www.rippin-kitten.com/ 

And if I left you out, please don't complain to Solberg.  Just twitter me your blog and I'll catch up.

Thursday, February 10, 2011

CUNT BLOGGERS BAITING ACTORS


There's an article circulating the web right now about supposed comments Charlie Hunnam made about the writing of Sons of Anarchy.  It's not E-online, but they should be ashamed of themselves for reprinting it.  I'm not going to include a link to the original blog because I don't want to feed the bullshit machine (although I know this entry will indeed bring more attention to it).  I've said it before, reporters, critics, bloggers make their hay by how many "hits" an article generates.  There are a lot of good reporters out there, generating important content, but for every legitimate one, there's an unscrupulous one, who will do just about anything for a juicy headline or a tawdry twist.  

I read the article about Charlie and immediately knew that it was taken out of context.  There's no one on my show more respectful of every one's creative process than Charlie Hunnam.  From Craft Service to the writing and directing, Charlie is a consummate professional.  He is too intelligent and too decent to spout off the way the article insinuates he did.  Charlie called me, when someone told him about it, and he informed me of what I had expected -- it's a ridiculous bullshit blog, where the cunt reporter baited him with antagonistic questions, ultimately getting an angry reply -- pointed at the cunt, not the show.
  
UPDATED: There's an audio file attached to the site now that allows you to hear Charlie's response.  What you don't hear are the actual questions that led up to the response.  Charlie's answer is measured, as he is clearly trying to restrain himself.  My beef with the blog is not what Charlie said, but how it was presented.  It painted Charlie as a disgruntled actor who has no respect for the writing.  That was the intent, that was how the blogosphere interpreted it.  The cunt knew that.  He knew he was publishing spun bullshit that was going to start trouble. 

Cunt.  A strong word, but oh, so accurate in describing these pathetic whores who manipulate reality for their own greed and advancement.  They tear down trust and damage careers.  If I ever meet the cunt who wrote the article (and I know who the fuck you are), I'll rip his fucking heart, shit in the hole, then make his mother eat it.

But Kurt, how do you really feel?  Like I want to hurt something.  Motherfuckers.  They should all die.

Friday, February 04, 2011

BACK IN THE ROOM

I'm back with my writers on Monday to begin breaking season four of Sons of Anarchy.  Crazy, right?  Feels like yesterday that I started this blog about the process of running a show.  Wow.  Once again, I'm reminded that I have the coolest job in the world and that even though I blow hard, I'm a lucky and grateful motherfucker. 

I have a pretty good sense of where we will begin season four and a half-complete sense of where we will finish.  Basically, I know the mile markers, I just don't know how or when we will get there.  That's the meat that I hang with my very talented writers.  Who are my writers, you ask?  They are, in order of sexual favors, Dave "Squeaky" Erickson, Chris "The Cleaner" Collins, Regina "Tornado" Corrado, Liz "the scarier twin" Sagal, Marco "Polo" Ramirez, and Brady "I'm not your fucking" Dahl.  Like their showrunner, they are the most dangerous scribes in Hollywood.  Most of them I've pulled from prisons and asylums, except the ones repped by CAA, those I found masturbating in public restrooms.

Where was I... This season, I'm trying to approach the room with a looser grip on story.  Season three, the story drove the characters more than the characters drove the story.  That was my intention.  It's still up for debate as to whether it was better or worse than previous seasons, but I knew coming into season three most of the details of the Ireland narrative.  This season, although there is a big story that will drive a lot of the episodes, I'm hoping that character will move the episodes forward as much as story.  By character, I mean the emotional lives of Jax, Clay and the others, and their relationships to one another.  So the season will be about the shit they feel, as much as the shit they do.     

I always knew our guys would be heading to jail at the end of season three or four.  Most of the bikers I've met in the outlaw life have done prison time.  I always thought it would be a cool, organic device to have a long passage of time.  One that allowed us to reboot the narrative and prevent the mythology from folding into itself too soon.  I felt one of the story traps we faced on The Shield was that Vic's machinations began to turn inward on him after season three.  So we were always faced with the dilemma of keeping his karmic history ever present and yet not so close that it inhibited him from being proactive.  I mean, when you begin a series by killing a cop, there's already a steep, downward trajectory.  Of course, Shawn navigated the show brilliantly so the story never collapsed, but it was a big writer challenge in the later seasons.  We had nearly as many charts and graphs as Lost.  Okay, that's an exaggeration, but you get the point... a lot of dirty details and dead bodies.

So this season on SOA, I am not encumbered by any narrative loose ends (like a baby in a boat).  Yes, there are historical, emotional and familial connective tissue, but story-wise, I get a reboot.  It's a blessing and a curse really.  It's much easier, creatively, coming into a season with a narrative that's already on the ground running.  You plug in and pick up where you left off.  Rebooting means that you have to really do the homework on each character's life over the passage of time we've missed.  What happened, how have they changed and how do you communicate those changes to the audience without belaboring a premier with buckets of exposition?  But I'm really looking forward to that game.  Anything can happen in fourteen months.  Bobby grows an afro, Tig decides celibacy is the answer, Happy smokes so much weed he thinks he's both Simon and Garfunkel, Juice gets booty implants and a weave, Gemma becomes a Scientologist and decides she's gotta "clear" Tara... it's fucking endless.  

Stay tuned...
 
Copyright 2010 SutterInk